American history Essay

In the course of American history, the American the great unwashed pee-pee been confronted with different panics to its politics, economy and way of life of life. At present, the continuing threat of world-wide terrorism and the unceasing wave of Anti-Americanism argon constantly putting the lives of simple Americans towards disquietude and uncertainty, notwithstanding exclusively the different cordial issues they face each passing day, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as gay marriage, abortion, and stem-cell research, among cosmosy differents.These threats had their accept counterparts in previous historic period, and it is worthy to tone that different side of the American policy-making fence all had their own positions on various matters of serious attention then, and seemingly, those sexagenarian issues remain as hotly debated up until this moment. The paper will examine the material threats and pre-conceived threats by Americans through the different decades such as racism, immigration, government regulation, ontogenyism, and m any early(a) issues and kind questions that have made the coupled States the brimming democracy of ideas it continues to be until today. ontogeny and the Origin of Man and the Earth In the twenties, a most important concern has been the continuing parley on growing vis-a-vis fundamental Christian discussion on the ancestry of human beings. In Reverend Dixons Sermon on the Evils of Darwinism and Evolution, he is clearly mistaken for lumping the surmisal of exploitation per se, with the racist theory of social Darwinism of Herbert Spencer.He is clearly mistaken in doing so, because never had the theory of developing posited that ontogenesis is notwithstanding a matter of excerpt of the fittest, thus, the weak may necessarily be oppressed, thus, may be destroyed in the conduct of human evolution. (165) much(prenominal) a position is clearly misinformed, because what the theory of evolution merely suggests is that humans, as per the evidence culled in the development and evolution of different species, may have descended, not from the scriptural Adam, as many fundamental Christians believe, but from apes and monkeys.The anaesthetize with Reverend Dixon, and all other purveyors of the scriptural interpretation on the origin of man is that their answers to the scientific question on evolution was never based on a scientific reply itself, but merely on a re rambleion of book of account verses that never could man have descended from apes, scarcely because he descended from God himself. Then and now, the drive why creationism rest absolutely push aside among scientific circles is the basic fact that no scientific reply has ever been posited to the Darwinian challenge on the origin of man.The evolutionary scientists atomic number 18 no slight Christian by continuously asserting their Darwinian position. Defense Attorney Darrows query of Prosecutor Bryan during the Monkey Trial is stabilizing in better understanding the fundamentalist Christian views of the day, which permeates much in the evolution debate of today. Darrows line of oppugn clearly seeks to debunk the literal biblical interpretation of fundamentalist Christians, which in this outcome might be Prosecutor Bryan. period Bryan asserts that the creation of the world occurred six-thousand years ago, Darrow insists that the Chinese civilization had been in subsistence thousands of years more than that, and rightly so, but Bryan stiff unfazed with such statements, firmly believing, in jeering fashion, that the integrity is on his side. (167) In the discourse of the origin of man, and the creation of the world, fundamental Christians have remained unfazed, in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence, especially on the age of the earth, that the truth as stated in the script is the lone(prenominal) truth that needs to be believed by any God-fearing person.Such a position is dangerous, because it creates a belief that is blind and dogmatic, and obscures believers from the well-intentioned truth provided by science in determining antecedently unknown facts about humans and the lifelike world in which they exist. Unfortunately, this position remains the subject of intense debate until today, with creationism advocates openhearted School Boards and lobbying Capitol Hill to cut keep for the instruction of evolution, and/or to provide exist educational exposure to creationism and its corollary theory, Intelligent Design. ashen Supremacy and Racism Another threat during the twenties was the rise of washragness supremacy in the face of a dissilient anti-racism and black civil rights stool as represented in the literary plant of Langston Hughes and F. Scott Fitzgerald. The Klan treatise on Americanism is nothing but inane rhetoric on the need to assert white supremacy in all corners of America, through patriotism, Protestantism and the glorification of the white race.( 171) The anesthetise with their position on Americanism is that much of their assertions are based on their normative innovation of the world and its history, without due regard to other history narratives on the founding of America, the manipulation of Protestantism in exposing the excesses of Roman Catholicism, and the absolute penury of a discourse based on the mere historic successes and failures of races.It is clear, however, the Klan remains stuck on their unrepentant Southern position on the continuing subjugation and slavery of African-Americans to be treated like chattel, and the relegation of other colored races as mere thirdhand citizens to American whites, merely because the conflicts and contradictions that occur in this world is race-based, instead of class-based.It is a prosperous racist position though, because rich whites American obfuscate the presumable class contradictions mingled with peasants and landowners, regardless of race, in order to whole gain the trust of poor white Americans against the hapless African-American who remains to exist as chattel in the racist eyes of the white supremacist.On the other hand, the Klans position on Protestantism is without any causal connection to their white supremacist cause, move out for the assertion that without Protestantism, there would have been no America. (171) Sadly, it is based on this simplistic verbalism on Protestantism vis-a-vis Americanism that the Klan discriminates against whites who do not share their same belief system, in much the same manner that, precisely because other races are non-white, they deserve to be discriminated, ipso facto.Nonetheless, such simplistic and flawed logic is also the reason by which the Klan has only remained and self-degenerated in the poorer, uneducated sections of the American South, and never really expanded into the large coastal cities where racial prejudice is much less because of continuous racial intermingling and higher levels of e ducational attainment. It must be stated, however, that despite the apparent rise of white supremacy in the American South, the seeds of the black civil rights movement of the fifties and the sixties had been planted as early as the twenties, through the prose and verse line of Langston Hughes.In his poetry, One-Way Ticket, it laments about the blank space in the American South, and the persona would instead be in the cosmopolitan cities where African-American are better respected and accustomed their fair share of human dignity, in comparison to the lynching and ridicule of the South. (173) It is a good thing, nonetheless, that the struggle between white supremacy and black civil rights had been sort of successful for the latter, not only from brown v. Board of Education and desegregation, but until today, with the resource of Barack Obama, African-American, and 44th President of the United States of America.